Day 4: Galatians 3–4

In a nutshell: Paul resorts to brow-beating and exegesis when the Galatians deviate from the message that initially inspired them to rally behind Jesus.

You clueless Galatians! Who has cast an evil eye on you, putting you under a spell? Your own eyes saw Jesus, God’s Anointed, graphically portrayed on a cross. … How stupid can you be? Do you really think that what was begun by God’s presence and power can be completed by a merely earthly life?
—Gal 3:1, 3 (Scholars Version trans.)

For the sake of consistency and sanity, I’m publishing a couple posts in advance of the (US) holiday weekend. This reading is for the 4th of July. Expect a whole slew of links to 30 Days of Paul around the web after the weekend!

Sin as Generic, Pervasive Corruption

Two interesting developments from Westar’s academic seminars just clapped together in this reading for me:

  1. The Scholars Version employed by the Paul Seminar translates hamartia as “the seductive power of corruption” instead of the more obscure word “sin.”
  2. For the Christianity Seminar we have been reading and discussing the Nag Hammadi collection of texts in some depth, and—surprise, surprise!—corruption is often understood in these texts as a quality that permeates the whole world in a rather generic and broad way.

Maybe this observation will only seem groundbreaking if you were raised as I was in a Pentecostal or Evangelical church, where sin is most often understood to be highly personal and individual. Basically, I was raised to translate sin as personal guilt for wrongdoing. In reading Galatians I find myself overwhelmed with the view of sin as a generic state of affairs instead of a psychological battle waged from within.

It helps to read Paul alongside what people went on to write later on the basis of his letters:

Paul: If there were a law that had the power to create life, then our acceptance by God would indeed be based on the law. But the scripture confined everything under the seductive power of corruption… (Gal 3:21b–22a)

Paul: When like children we knew no better, we were dominated by the cosmic powers that controlled human fate. (Gal 4:3)

Jesus in a vision to John, explains how the corrupted world came into existence: Our fellow sister, Wisdom-Sophia … freely willed a likeness within herself although the Spirit had not agreed with her nor had it consented nor had her partner approved, the male virginal Spirit. … Because of the audacity within her, her thought was not able to be idle and her product came forth, being imperfect, ugly in his appearance, because she had made it without her partner (Secret Revelation of John 10:1, 2, 7–8; ANNT trans.). This being, named Yaldabaoth, goes on to create the world humans now inhabit. He thinks he is god, but he is mistaken, ignorant of the higher god above, so the world he creates and rules is corrupt out of his ignorance.

Mary, upon encountering cosmic powers of darkness, ignorance, and eagerness for death: They asked the soul, ‘Where are you coming from, human-killer, and where are you going you place-destroyer?’ The Soul answered and said, ‘What rules me has been slain, and what turns me has been destroyed, and my desire has been filled, and ignorance has died. In a world I was released from a world, and in a mold from a higher mold, and from the chain of forgetfulness which is temporal…” (Gospel of Mary 9:26–28; ANNT trans.)

More examples of this abound. Strange though many of the Nag Hammadi stories may sound to us in their unfamiliarity, they were crafted through careful interpretation of Jewish Scriptures, especially Genesis, using Paul’s letters as a key.

Blake-Elohim-Adam
William Blake, Elohim Creating Adam (1795–c. 1805). For Blake the God of the Old Testament was a false god. He believed the Fall of Man took place not in the Garden of Eden, but at the time of creation shown here, when man was dragged from the spiritual realm and made material.

In fact, for some Nag Hammadi texts, Paul is the only legitimate apostle! They refer to “the apostle” in the singular. How apt that is when one considers yesterday’s reading:

Even if one of us, or for that matter a messenger from heaven, were to advocate a message different from the one we delivered—they must be rejected and shunned! We told you before and now I repeat it: anyone who champions a message other than the one you heard from us—they must be rejected and shunned! (Gal 1:8–9)

I can’t stress enough how influential this particular letter has been on Christian history. It’s no wonder we struggle to read it outside the filter of later generations of theology. I’m not sure I’m even succeeding at it in this reading, but my main point today is simply that Paul was not a psychologist and he wasn’t interested in personal guilt. He is describing a wide political context—the “state of the union.”

As our reading progresses, I believe we’ll find that Paul is optimistic about human beings’ ability to climb out of the corruption and live their way into divinity, in the sense of divinity as perfection.

Let me qualify that. I live in a majority-Mormon region of the United States, where the notion of working one’s way to a celestial state of affairs is not that strange. We can take a lesson from Mormon readings of Paul that the material for such readings really is in there even though many of us have learned to read right past it.

I’m not endorsing Mormon theology; frankly, I don’t know enough about what they teach and do in temple to really give an informed opinion. I’m simply pointing out that, like the writer of Secret Revelation of John and other Nag Hammadi texts, later generations of readers have independently entertained the notion that the gap between human and divine simply wasn’t as wide in the ancient world as we often think of it today.

Today we see a stark divide between human reality and divine, “out of this universe” claims. But in the ancient world this was a spectrum that included men, half-men, demons, angels, and gods as agents. Paul’s message is that one moves toward perfection through Jesus, to whom one must pledge allegiance and then live in accordance with his model. It’s not intellectual or ritual or ethical but some holistic combination of all these that, for Paul, finds expression in community with one another.

Questions for the Road:

  • Paul uses a lot of language about adoption, heirs, and children of God in this reading as a way to make the nations (“gentiles”) full members of God’s family. This wonderfully inclusive language has inspired many social justice movements. But Paul frequently does this while being critical of Israel and Jewish customs that are still very common today. He even says that Jerusalem is Hagar the slave! This sort of language has fed into generations of anti-Semitic attitudes. Is it possible to live with and be inspired by Paul’s inclusive language here without accepting this darker underside?
  • Is sin a living concept for you? What has shaped your ideas about sin? Is there any advantage to defining sin as a generic condition rather than a psychological “personal guilt” thing? For instance, could it be compared to the Buddhist precept that “life is suffering”?

Letters of Paul small squareThanks for reading this entry from the #30DaysofPaul reading challenge. We’re reading the seven undisputed letters of Paul in 30 days: 1 Thessalonians, Galatians, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, Philemon, Philippians, Romans. Why not join us? Download the reading plan, which is based on the work of the Westar Paul Seminar as published in The Authentic Letters of Paul.

Cassandra FarrinCassandra Farrin joined Westar in 2010 and currently serves as the Marketing & Outreach Director. A US-UK Fulbright Scholar, she has an M.A. in Religious Studies from Lancaster University (England) and a B.A. in Religious Studies from Willamette University. She is passionate about books and projects that in some way address the intersection of ethics and early Christian history.

4 thoughts on “Day 4: Galatians 3–4

  1. Chapters three and four contain Marcion’s Pauline gospel. I am using BeDuhn and/or Hermann Detering’s reconstructions. The Marcionite version of Galatians is much shorter and, because it doesn’t rely so much on (canonical) esoteric gibberish, it is more intelligible. When – probably begrudgingly – the Christian powers in Rome had to accept Paul’s letters (and wrote Acts of the Apostles to redefine Paul), they had to “work over” the Paulines, first collected by Marcion, as far as we know. Note how clear they are.

    Chapter three: Whoever is under the law is under a curse. The ethical person will live based on trust. Christos purchased us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse on our behalf. The Law had imprisoned (enslaved) folks under wrongdoing. (This is developed more in the first large unit of Romans, 1 – 8.)

    Chapter four: This is a new age! God sent forth his son in order to purchase those under Law so that these folks could be adopted. Adopted people are no longer slaves (to the law) but heirs to God! [Detering] You were enslaved to gods that by nature are not gods. But, you are turning back to these weak and worthless elementary principles of the world whose slaves you want to be once more? You observe days and months and seasons and years and Sabbaths and kosher meals and fasting and holy days (Tert. 5.4.6). I have worked in vain. When I look at the next nine verses, using Detering’s construction, it seems to me to be a chiasm. The “meat” of this block is the question, “Have I then become your enemy by telling you the truth?” He spends the rest of the time with his allegory of Abe and his heir.

    To the proto-orthodoxy, Marcion’s idea that the god of the Jews was not the supreme god caused all kinds of problems. It did, however, explain many things, like the harshness found in the Hebrew scriptures versus the “grace,” the goodness of the god of Jesus. The world in which Marcion (and by this time most of Christianity) operated was the world where there were a number of gods, demons, angels and the like. His proposal was fairly modest compared to others of that time!

    Like

  2. Galatians 3, a paraphrase: Our preaching created a powerful visual for you of Christ crucified. Did you not receive the Spirit by hearing what we said? Certainly it wasn’t by performing the requirements of the Torah. What I’m saying is that God called Abraham a good person because of his trust, and further he promised a blessing (the spirit) on all those who trust. The Torah itself calls down a curse upon those who don’t obey all its prescriptions; such obedience is impossible. Christ took this curse upon himself and broke it when he “hung on a tree.” Thus his death opened each of us to the possibility of a life of trust. This is our rightful inheritance, God’s promise to Abraham, which cannot be nullified by something, i.e., the Torah that came over 400 years later. So why did we have to put up with the Torah. It was a stop-gap measure on wrong-doing administered by angels through Moses. This multiple party process was doomed to failure, for God is One. Imprisoned, guarded, and disciplined by Torah, wrong-doing continued so that God’s promise of being a good person through trust could reach its fulfillment in Jesus Christ.

    Galatians 4, a paraphrase: Another way to look at this is that we are heirs under the Torah which acts as guardian and trustee until the time appointed by the Father. And another way to say it is that we’ve been enslaved to the lesser spirits of the world until we could hear about God’s Son crucified, inspiring us to cry out “Father,” and to experience adoption as God’s child. Do you really want to return to those weak worthless spirits and their demands of day, month, and season observances. Please friends, I have shown you the right way, become as I am. Our enemies want you for themselves, to brag on you, but not for a good purpose. Believe me, my effort is as intense as the pain of childbirth, until Christ is formed in you, as he lives in me. I admit to being totally puzzled by you. Allow me one more comparison from the Torah itself for the truth I bring. Abraham had two sons, one born to a slave, the other born to a free woman as promised by God. These women represent two covenants, one leading through the Torah on Mt. Sinai to the present Jerusalem, the other leading to the Jerusalem above which is free of the Torah. You my friends are children of the second covenant, born according to the Spirit. And as with the first two sons, you are the one persecuted, but hold fast to your spiritual birth.

    ————

    In spite of all of this complicated descriptive material, there is only one relevant question. Does personal and social well-being, and the defeat of this evil age and wrong-doing come by putting the Spirit or the Law at the center of life? Galatians could be called anti-Semitism in its first form, but it’s really a mis-used in-house battle worked out in many forms across the centuries. Paul’s language is God-centered, definitive and extreme, but law will always have its place in human life. I…

    Like

  3. continued: I don’t think that the Buddhist concept of suffering can be easily incorporated into Paul’s worldview. The essence of suffering for the Buddhists is attachment and the correct response is some form of detachment. On the other hand, Jesus seems to have advocated and lived an attached involved life. He apparently taught the same to his listeners and followers.

    Note: I’m not sure that this letter was written to anyone in Galatia. It seems that the requirements for understanding such a writing would not be found in the native religious environs of primitive Galatia. Tertullian indicates that Marcion found the letter in his travels. I think probably that he gave the title “Galatians” to the writing because it seemed to be his favorite and because Galatia was his native home in Pontus.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s